Jump to content
The Dark Mod Forums

The growing divide in genetic quality as main reason for social and political divide today


Outlooker

Recommended Posts

Somehow though Switzerland voted in a referendum against universal basic income.

Speaking of wisdom from the people... Direct democracy right there. For what it's worth.

 

Some Nordic countries though want to add it. We shall see how it works I guess. Should keep everyone happy, but at what cost?

This much is true, you see calls to spread the money often, but spread the work is seldom, rarely heard.

I like to record difficult stealth games, and right now you wonderful people are the only ones delivering on that front.

Click here for the crappy channel where that happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Genes don't have anything to do with it. It's all about upbringing which develops the right attitude for success.

  • Like 1

I have an eclectic YouTube channel making videos on a variety of games. Come and have look here:

https://www.youtube.com/c/NeonsStyleHD

 

Dark Mod Missions: Briarwood Manor - available here or in game

http://forums.thedarkmod.com/topic/18980-fan-mission-briarwood-manor-by-neonsstyle-first-mission-6082017-update-16/

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Genes don't have anything to do with it. It's all about upbringing which develops the right attitude for success.

 

Way to be wrong. Sad!

 

Intelligence and physical attractiveness

 

Height and reproductive success in a cohort of british men

 

Standing tall pays off, study finds

 

When it comes to height, every inch counts--in fact, in the workplace, each inch above average may be worth $789 more per year, according to a study in the Journal of Applied Psychology (Vol. 89, No. 3).
The findings suggest that someone who is 6 feet tall earns, on average, nearly $166,000 more during a 30-year career than someone who is 5 feet 5 inches--even when controlling for gender, age and weight.
The researchers found that physical attractiveness had a significant impact on how much people got paid, how educated they were, and how they evaluated themselves. Basically, people who were rated good-looking made more money, were better educated and were more confident. But the effects of a person's intelligence on income were stronger than those of a person's attractiveness.

 

 

I guess the only thing left to dig up would be the evidence that genes are correlated with IQ. Something that should be plain to anyone since your genetic code determines somewhat important things... like your brain development at the cellular level. It should also be obvious that genetic disorders can lead to lower IQ.
It's true that upbringing will affect your intelligence and your ability to become successful. Someone kept in solitary confinement during their childhood will probably not become very successful or develop "the right attitude". But denying the existence of genetic factors is just ignorant.
Edited by jaxa
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's important but we don't know the exact correlation and odds of causation for genes and empiric experiences of each individual in connection to their development.

  • Like 1

"I really perceive that vanity about which most men merely prate — the vanity of the human or temporal life. I live continually in a reverie of the future. I have no faith in human perfectibility. I think that human exertion will have no appreciable effect upon humanity. Man is now only more active — not more happy — nor more wise, than he was 6000 years ago. The result will never vary — and to suppose that it will, is to suppose that the foregone man has lived in vain — that the foregone time is but the rudiment of the future — that the myriads who have perished have not been upon equal footing with ourselves — nor are we with our posterity. I cannot agree to lose sight of man the individual, in man the mass."...

- 2 July 1844 letter to James Russell Lowell from Edgar Allan Poe.

badge?user=andarson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Genes don't have anything to do with it. It's all about upbringing which develops the right attitude for success.

While I wouldn't go quite that far, I do believe this is on the right track.

 

Besides, a fixed-mindset, especially at the individual level, is one of the most demotivating things possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I wouldn't go quite that far, I do believe this is on the right track.

 

Besides, a fixed-mindset, especially at the individual level, is one of the most demotivating things possible.

 

It's a combination of things usually.

 

Every person needs an individual start, push and effort. A break of covenant biblically speaking. Overcoming your condition and going forward. Otherwise it's not good. And not worth living.

"I really perceive that vanity about which most men merely prate — the vanity of the human or temporal life. I live continually in a reverie of the future. I have no faith in human perfectibility. I think that human exertion will have no appreciable effect upon humanity. Man is now only more active — not more happy — nor more wise, than he was 6000 years ago. The result will never vary — and to suppose that it will, is to suppose that the foregone man has lived in vain — that the foregone time is but the rudiment of the future — that the myriads who have perished have not been upon equal footing with ourselves — nor are we with our posterity. I cannot agree to lose sight of man the individual, in man the mass."...

- 2 July 1844 letter to James Russell Lowell from Edgar Allan Poe.

badge?user=andarson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

It's a combination of things usually.

 

Every person needs an individual start, push and effort. A break of covenant biblically speaking. Overcoming your condition and going forward. Otherwise it's not good. And not worth living.

Can you elaborate a bit more on this?

 

That last statement there could be seen as quite harsh, although I don't think you intended it as such.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you elaborate a bit more on this?

 

That last statement there could be seen as quite harsh, although I don't think you intended it as such.

Apologies. All I meant was, to do things for self perfection. To be better today than you were yesterday. And maybe become a better person tomorrow. Edited by Anderson

"I really perceive that vanity about which most men merely prate — the vanity of the human or temporal life. I live continually in a reverie of the future. I have no faith in human perfectibility. I think that human exertion will have no appreciable effect upon humanity. Man is now only more active — not more happy — nor more wise, than he was 6000 years ago. The result will never vary — and to suppose that it will, is to suppose that the foregone man has lived in vain — that the foregone time is but the rudiment of the future — that the myriads who have perished have not been upon equal footing with ourselves — nor are we with our posterity. I cannot agree to lose sight of man the individual, in man the mass."...

- 2 July 1844 letter to James Russell Lowell from Edgar Allan Poe.

badge?user=andarson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The genes idea is an old one, and has slowly been dropped in psychology. The idea that genes determine how successful you are goes back to the

corrupted ideas of evolution by Dietrich Eckart before WW2. His ideas of antisemitism was a deep influence on that nutter Hitler. After WW2 these ideas

began to turn into genes for success, and it's still around today. Recently The Guardian wrote an article on just this. I think this is the source

of the original authors argument for this in this thread. It's a very corrupt idea today and is long since dead.

 

However modern thought has shown that genes provide a solid basis, however success is determined predominantly by the influences on a child

in the formative years before school. There has been a long debate for the last 70 years over the concept of Nature vs Nurture. For years it had

to be one or the other. However as is often the case, it's turned out in a number of studies recently that it is both.

 

You are not born into this world with concrete strapped to your legs to hold you down. You are free at any time to redefine yourself. This is usualyl not

possible in a child, but in a thinking adult, it is very true. Success is mostly an attitude that the only way to fail in this world is not to try, and that

as long as you keep trying, you will reach the break through point. One of the biggest things to learn; is how to stop putting yourself in your

way. Dale Carnegie calls this Excusitis. ie constantly coming up with excuses for why you shouldn't do what you know you should do. Usually

it takes the form of, "I can only do it, if it's this way", or "I need this before I can do it".

 

Success is and always will be in your own hands. Although nurture plays a big role in whether someone will achieve or not, you are not bound by that.

If your upbringing was not supportive, you can at any time, redefine yourself. It takes commitment, and determination to achieve that, but you

can do it.

 

Here's one good reason not to believe genes define success. If you believe that, then you will always make excuses for not chasing your dreams.

 

There is no concrete wheel chained to you to hold you back. Only you, stand in your own way.

Edited by NeonsStyle
  • Like 2

I have an eclectic YouTube channel making videos on a variety of games. Come and have look here:

https://www.youtube.com/c/NeonsStyleHD

 

Dark Mod Missions: Briarwood Manor - available here or in game

http://forums.thedarkmod.com/topic/18980-fan-mission-briarwood-manor-by-neonsstyle-first-mission-6082017-update-16/

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recent Status Updates

    • taffernicus

      i am so euphoric to see new FMs keep coming out and I am keen to try it out in my leisure time, then suddenly my PC is spouting a couple of S.M.A.R.T errors...
      tbf i cannot afford myself to miss my network emulator image file&progress, important ebooks, hyper-v checkpoint & hyper-v export and the precious thief & TDM gamesaves. Don't fall yourself into & lay your hands on crappy SSD
       
      · 3 replies
    • OrbWeaver

      Does anyone actually use the Normalise button in the Surface inspector? Even after looking at the code I'm not quite sure what it's for.
      · 7 replies
    • Ansome

      Turns out my 15th anniversary mission idea has already been done once or twice before! I've been beaten to the punch once again, but I suppose that's to be expected when there's over 170 FMs out there, eh? I'm not complaining though, I love learning new tricks and taking inspiration from past FMs. Best of luck on your own fan missions!
      · 4 replies
    • The Black Arrow

      I wanna play Doom 3, but fhDoom has much better features than dhewm3, yet fhDoom is old, outdated and probably not supported. Damn!
      Makes me think that TDM engine for Doom 3 itself would actually be perfect.
      · 6 replies
    • Petike the Taffer

      Maybe a bit of advice ? In the FM series I'm preparing, the two main characters have the given names Toby and Agnes (it's the protagonist and deuteragonist, respectively), I've been toying with the idea of giving them family names as well, since many of the FM series have named protagonists who have surnames. Toby's from a family who were usually farriers, though he eventually wound up working as a cobbler (this serves as a daylight "front" for his night time thieving). Would it make sense if the man's popularly accepted family name was Farrier ? It's an existing, though less common English surname, and it directly refers to the profession practiced by his relatives. Your suggestions ?
      · 9 replies
×
×
  • Create New...