Jump to content
The Dark Mod Forums

Missing GL implementation for Linux


Hamlet

Recommended Posts

I am trying to compile The Dark Mod (r7203) under Linux.
It appears commit r7128 calls GLimp_DeactivateFrontendContext() (framework/Session.cpp line 3017), whose implementation is not provided for Linux (sys/linux/glimp.cpp), while it is provided for Windows (sys/win32/win_glimp.cpp).

 

Any solution to this?

Edited by Hamlet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am trying to compile The Dark Mod (r7203) under Linux.

It appears commit r7128 calls GLimp_DeactivateFrontendContext() (framework/Session.cpp line 3107), whose implementation is not provided for Linux (sys/linux/glimp.cpp), while it is provided for Windows (sys/win32/win_glimp.cpp).

 

Any solution to this?

 

What is the Linux version of qwglMakeCurrent? The function is rather simple.

void GLimp_DeactivateFrontendContext() {
	qwglMakeCurrent( NULL, NULL );
}
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That seems to be a rather tough question from a little searching.

It seems there's no pre-built function like this in Linux and different developers are rolling their own

or avoiding multi-threading on the Linux side.

Please visit TDM's IndieDB site and help promote the mod:

 

http://www.indiedb.com/mods/the-dark-mod

 

(Yeah, shameless promotion... but traffic is traffic folks...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That seems to be a rather tough question from a little searching.

It seems there's no pre-built function like this in Linux and different developers are rolling their own

or avoiding multi-threading on the Linux side.

Then an empty function for now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is the Linux version of qwglMakeCurrent? The function is rather simple.

void GLimp_DeactivateFrontendContext() {
	qwglMakeCurrent( NULL, NULL );
}

I can use either an empty function,

void GLimp_DeactivateFrontendContext() {}

or a function similar to what you suggest in the quote:

void GLimp_DeactivateFrontendContext() {
	assert( dpy );
	qglXMakeCurrent( dpy, None, NULL );
}

(this is actually the same as Linux implementation of GLimp_DeactivateContext())...

Where should I look for failure when testing? Just to be clear: I have no clue what I am doing, here.

 

Actually, I can't because I have another army of missing functions after this one... but that's for another thread, since it's from a different commit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not? I do. Last I tried, it worked fine in the menu. I couldn't load any actual missions for some reason which had nothing to do with the renderer. But if the menu works, there's no fundamental reason why it wouldn't work ingame.

Edited by cabalistic
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Try r_useGLSL 0

 

The GLSL renderer is probably using extensions that are too new for free drivers.

 

You'll need to set r_softShadows 0 before you change that because this setting forces GLSL on.

Please visit TDM's IndieDB site and help promote the mod:

 

http://www.indiedb.com/mods/the-dark-mod

 

(Yeah, shameless promotion... but traffic is traffic folks...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used the NIVIDIA proprietary drivers, and enabling or disabling GLSL made no difference. Again, I'm not sure the problem was related to the renderer at all. But I don't really use Linux outside of work anymore, so I didn't have the chance to investigate further...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recent Status Updates

    • OrbWeaver

      Does anyone actually use the Normalise button in the Surface inspector? Even after looking at the code I'm not quite sure what it's for.
      · 3 replies
    • Ansome

      Turns out my 15th anniversary mission idea has already been done once or twice before! I've been beaten to the punch once again, but I suppose that's to be expected when there's over 170 FMs out there, eh? I'm not complaining though, I love learning new tricks and taking inspiration from past FMs. Best of luck on your own fan missions!
      · 4 replies
    • The Black Arrow

      I wanna play Doom 3, but fhDoom has much better features than dhewm3, yet fhDoom is old, outdated and probably not supported. Damn!
      Makes me think that TDM engine for Doom 3 itself would actually be perfect.
      · 6 replies
    • Petike the Taffer

      Maybe a bit of advice ? In the FM series I'm preparing, the two main characters have the given names Toby and Agnes (it's the protagonist and deuteragonist, respectively), I've been toying with the idea of giving them family names as well, since many of the FM series have named protagonists who have surnames. Toby's from a family who were usually farriers, though he eventually wound up working as a cobbler (this serves as a daylight "front" for his night time thieving). Would it make sense if the man's popularly accepted family name was Farrier ? It's an existing, though less common English surname, and it directly refers to the profession practiced by his relatives. Your suggestions ?
      · 9 replies
    • nbohr1more

      Looks like the "Reverse April Fools" releases were too well hidden. Darkfate still hasn't acknowledge all the new releases. Did you play any of the new April Fools missions?
      · 5 replies
×
×
  • Create New...