Jump to content


Photo

FCC ready to roll back and gut Net Neutrality issues


  • Please log in to reply
39 replies to this topic

#26 nbohr1more

nbohr1more

    Darkmod PR, Wordsmith

  • Development Role
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 9504 posts

Posted 29 November 2017 - 04:38 PM

2016


That was the ministry of truth bill. Bipartisan == scumbags who don't want Wikileaks or similar news sites (not tied to the Military Industrial Complex)
to expose real substantive truth about crimes perpetrated by legislators. Example: FEC violations in the Wikileaks releases that have yet to be prosecuted...

Net Neutrality is 2014:

https://en.wikipedia...e_United_States
Please visit TDM's IndieDB site and help promote the mod:

http://www.indiedb.c...ds/the-dark-mod

(Yeah, shameless promotion... but traffic is traffic folks...)

#27 Kurshok

Kurshok

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 223 posts

Posted 30 November 2017 - 08:32 PM

If bet neytrality goes, the freedom of the Internet goes with it. We need to do EVERYTHING in our power to show Ajit Pai that he better stop this nonsense, and if he doesn't, then we'll make sure the rest of his pathetic life is miserable and suffers from eggings, dogshit being smeared on his car windows, keyscratched car, prank calls delivering 50 pizzas to him, etc...

#28 AluminumHaste

AluminumHaste

    Darkmod Contributor

  • Development Role
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6306 posts

Posted 01 December 2017 - 08:43 AM

Seeing as how he's already ignoring several MILLION comments on their own website, and listening to the pro-kill net neutrality which have shown that some peoples names were stolen to post them, I can't see how he's going to change his mind.

He was strongly against Net Neutrality when he was just a member and voted against it.

He quoted a graph showing that there was a dip in ISP spending after it went through and claims it's directly causated by Net Neutrality.

Couldn't POSSIBLY be because an election was coming up and a Republican had a good chance at winning the Presidency, so they were probably waiting to see what happened.


I always assumed I'd taste like boot leather.

 

#29 Kurshok

Kurshok

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 223 posts

Posted 04 December 2017 - 10:48 PM

Son of a bitch Pai says he's going to try and rush the bill, callin pro-net neutrality people "desperate". Cocksucker.

#30 rich_is_bored

rich_is_bored

    Advanced Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 886 posts

Posted 05 December 2017 - 04:18 AM

I dunno how he came to that conclusion. It's not like people are talking about slashing his tires or playing ding dong ditch if he doesn't do what they demand.



#31 jaxa

jaxa

    Advanced Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 1419 posts

Posted 05 December 2017 - 09:29 AM

Son of a bitch Pai says he's going to try and rush the bill, callin pro-net neutrality people "desperate". Cocksucker.

 

Are you pro-homophobia?



#32 Kurshok

Kurshok

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 223 posts

Posted 05 December 2017 - 09:16 PM

 
Are you pro-homophobia?

No. Sorry if I offended you. Maybe "a shit pie" is a better insult for him, since it sounds like his name and is a reference to that one movie where the black maid gets back at her racist ex employer by feeding her a pie with her shit in it.

#33 CarltonTroisi

CarltonTroisi

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 99 posts

Posted 06 December 2017 - 01:43 PM

Keep it clean, guys.  That has no place on TDM forums.


Edited by CarltonTroisi, 06 December 2017 - 01:44 PM.

  • Petike the Taffer likes this

#34 AluminumHaste

AluminumHaste

    Darkmod Contributor

  • Development Role
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6306 posts

Posted 06 December 2017 - 01:56 PM

This is off topic and a forum for adults, swearing is part of the language. Feel free to scroll past the post/topic if it offends you.


  • Petike the Taffer likes this

I always assumed I'd taste like boot leather.

 

#35 kano

kano

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 405 posts

Posted 06 December 2017 - 01:58 PM

On a kind of funny note, Google and Amazon are now fighting each other, (while putting customers in the middle). It goes like this. Amazon won't sell Google streaming gear, so Google is gonna block Amazon devices from watching Youtube!

 

https://www.ghacks.n...amazon-fire-tv/

 

It is funny, because the FCC is going to let the big ISPs sideline both of them by placing them at an artificial disadvantage to the respective video services that the ISP offers.



#36 AluminumHaste

AluminumHaste

    Darkmod Contributor

  • Development Role
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6306 posts

Posted 06 December 2017 - 02:18 PM

Also Amazon refused to implement Google Cast into their products. It's a tit for tat and very childish.


I always assumed I'd taste like boot leather.

 

#37 Kurshok

Kurshok

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 223 posts

Posted 14 December 2017 - 03:55 AM

That idiot Pai is trying to get people to go along with his plan by playing with fidget spinners and foam dart guns whilst wearing 3d glasses and babbling memes. Meanwhile, a woman came forward and revealed the FCC is using her DEAD husband's identity online to try and smear pro-net neutrality videos and posts. I hope someone takes a swing at this smug MFer's face and shatters his facial bones.

Edited by Kurshok, 14 December 2017 - 03:56 AM.


#38 Petike the Taffer

Petike the Taffer

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 436 posts

Posted 14 December 2017 - 07:46 PM

This is really crummy, to say the least.  :( My best wishes to the American forum members here. I hope this affects your daily browsing activities as least as possible. Can still someone attack this legally, as a violation of US anti-trust measures ?

 

While I wouldn't make a sacred cow out of net neutrality, I feel it has more benefits for the average, honest-paying user of the Internet, than it has downsides.


  • CarltonTroisi likes this

#39 Anderson

Anderson

    Advanced Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 1188 posts

Posted 16 December 2017 - 04:38 AM

It's supposed to go into effect within 1 year. But until then many things can change.


  • Petike the Taffer likes this

 "I really perceive that vanity about which most men merely prate — the vanity of the human or temporal life. I live continually in a reverie of the future. I have no faith in human perfectibility. I think that human exertion will have no appreciable effect upon humanity. Man is now only more active — not more happy — nor more wise, than he was 6000 years ago. The result will never vary — and to suppose that it will, is to suppose that the foregone man has lived in vain — that the foregone time is but the rudiment of the future — that the myriads who have perished have not been upon equal footing with ourselves — nor are we with our posterity. I cannot agree to lose sight of man the individual, in man the mass."...

 

 

- 2 July 1844 letter to James Russell Lowell from Edgar Allan Poe.

 


#40 Petike the Taffer

Petike the Taffer

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 436 posts

Posted 16 December 2017 - 09:41 AM

It's supposed to go into effect within 1 year. But until then many things can change.

 

I know. It would take a few months at least, and a whole year gives plenty of leeway for defending net neutrality.

 

While we in Europe (and plenty of other countries) don't have to directly worry, efforts like this set a bad precedent, especially given how large the US portion of the Internet still is even nowadays.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users