Jump to content
The Dark Mod Forums

What's Really Happening On Mars


Zaccheus

Recommended Posts

They've been doing that since the seventies with liitle result. No one is prepared to put the required outrageous amounts of money into manned expeditions to Mars.

A Moon base would be the first step and that's 20 years away, if we're being optimistic.

Civillisation will not attain perfection until the last stone, from the last church, falls on the last priest.

- Emil Zola

 

character models site

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I want to know is, if they can spend billions making this incredibly functional remotely operated machine to drive around the surface of another planet, why the hell don't they spend a few extra bucks and put some decent optics and storage hardware on the damn thing? Yes, yes; dust-proof, solar powered, recycled storage, blah blah, high tech, whatever. Fine. I understand it's very complex and amazing and has special needs. But for goodness sake, if you're going on a trip to Mars, include a camera that can take a decent picture, decent movies, and in color. I'll lend them my sony if they are so hard up on budget. It was only $400, sheesh. :P

Edited by SneaksieDave
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is that the data has to be transmitted back to Earth. That's why they need a special camera which can produce the kind of data they need. The sort of broadcast equipment required to send a powerful enough signal from Mars to Earth that could send back TV quailty pictures, would be too bulky, and there is extrtemely limited space on these probes.

Civillisation will not attain perfection until the last stone, from the last church, falls on the last priest.

- Emil Zola

 

character models site

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one is prepared to put the required outrageous amounts of money into manned expeditions to Mars.

This is true.

 

I do enjoy going to the NASA website and seeing all the funky stuff they are doing, but if you asked me how I would like the government to spend 1,000,000,000 pounds/euros/dollars, NASA/ESA would NOT be the first thing that springs to mind.

Edited by Zaccheus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, if you check out the JPL/NASA websites more thoroughly, you will find that the mars rovers have sent back vast quantities of very Hi-Res colour images, and various other instrument data, and have more thatn tripled their design specifications for operational duration. I can't remember the data transmission speed figures off hand, but I am pretty sure it is better than most Broadband connections you can get... If you go to the raw image collections you will find a lot more than the little press release images would seem to show you... I think it is money well spent, especially if you consider that they cost less than most crappy hollywood movies... if the US spent a tenth of what they spend on defence on the space program, we could have manned moon and mars bases in ten years...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spending on space exploration isn't sexy, at least not since they stopped having to look over the fence and continually outdo the Jones'. It doesn't get votes.

Stirring up paranoia and then soothing it by spending billions on security and 'defense' (the american term for 'attack') does get votes.

Civillisation will not attain perfection until the last stone, from the last church, falls on the last priest.

- Emil Zola

 

character models site

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1116518822_13678-4_dd_enhanced_486a-A496R1_br.gif

I saw one out in the field on the way to my parents the other day, looks like Mars has dust devils too. Perhaps one day when the technology gets advanced enough, the cost will drop low enough to be practical. B)

I dont fear the dark...the dark fears me!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well actually, the american paranoia soothing only gets votes from about half the american population, specifically the very partisan republican party... I think as soon as some valuable minerals found in space we'll have plenty of space stations and such, there just has to be comercial motivation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL - I did say space related.

 

It's likely someone will bomb someone else's launch sites on earth.

Edited by Zaccheus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's likely someone will bomb someone else's launch sites on earth.
I dont think that's much of a possibility, a space shuttle might look good on paper attached to a large fuel tank but I've heard Nasa has jacked up security around their launch areas over the last few years. Plus you have to take into account the fact that the area around the launch pad is kept clear of people when there is a flight about to begin, so an attack would be likely to only kill the shuttle crew. Terrorists like Al Queda like big body counts so I would worry more about crowded sports events or places where there are hundreds/thousands of people coming together at predictable times. Edited by John D.

I dont fear the dark...the dark fears me!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I built a spacecraft that could take me to Mars, could I automatically claim the planet for myself?
Interesting idea, we'd better grab the place while we can! :lol:

Seriously though, I think one major obstacle to any sort of permanent base is the harsh environment. If there was some sort of terraforming technique we could develop to give Mars a thicker, breathable atmosphere with some sort of ozone layer to help screen out the ultraviolet rays-and be able to do it in decades not centuries, perhaps there might be a greater interest in exploring the place. It would probably still be pretty cold though.

 

Wonder if nukes on the polar ice caps would kick up enough vaporized carbon dioxide/water vapor into the air to create some sort of greenhouse effect?

Edited by John D.

I dont fear the dark...the dark fears me!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm kicking myself that I'm probably part of the last generation that won't get to go to Mars and such cool stuff. But come to think of it I haven't been to most places on Earth yet, and there's a ton of more interesting stuff down here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who owns space anyway? Is it first come, first serve?

If I built a spacecraft that could take me to Mars, could I automatically claim the planet for myself?

I'd say for all intents and purposes, yes. There are already a number of private companies planning to mine asteroids (or at least assess the feasibility of doing so) in the next five to ten years or so.. I wouldn't be surprised, seeing as how NASA has dropped the ball in terms of manned space exploration, to see lots of private companies take ownership of large chunks of space... Ultimately ownership comes down to what you can defend - those with the military might to tell anyone who encroaches on territory they claim can tell anyone to fuck off, and ther is nothing any UN resolution can do about it really.

 

I am tipping Richard Branson to have Virgin Spaclines up and running tours to Mars long before NASA gets back on the moon .. Americans are too paranoid these days to revive the frontier spirit of the wild west days... My apologies if I have offended any Americans here.. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont think that's much of a possibility, a space shuttle might look good on paper attached to a large fuel tank but I've heard Nasa has jacked up security around their launch areas over the last few years. Plus you have to take into account the fact that the area around the launch pad is kept clear of people when there is a flight about to begin, so an attack would be likely to only kill the shuttle crew. Terrorists like Al Queda like big body counts so I would worry more about crowded sports events or places where there are hundreds/thousands of people coming together at predictable times.

Al Queda?

:lol:

 

I was thinking more along the lines of the US sending a brave fearless cruise missile into the heart of some rival country's space program, for reasons of pre-emptive national security of course.

;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was thinking more along the lines of the US sending a brave fearless cruise missile into the heart of some rival country's space program, for reasons of pre-emptive national security of course.

;)

They were hiding weapons of mass destruction under the launch pad I tell you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recent Status Updates

    • Petike the Taffer

      I've finally managed to log in to The Dark Mod Wiki. I'm back in the saddle and before the holidays start in full, I'll be adding a few new FM articles and doing other updates. Written in Stone is already done.
      · 0 replies
    • nbohr1more

      TDM 15th Anniversary Contest is now active! Please declare your participation: https://forums.thedarkmod.com/index.php?/topic/22413-the-dark-mod-15th-anniversary-contest-entry-thread/
       
      · 0 replies
    • JackFarmer

      @TheUnbeholden
      You cannot receive PMs. Could you please be so kind and check your mailbox if it is full (or maybe you switched off the function)?
      · 1 reply
    • OrbWeaver

      I like the new frob highlight but it would nice if it was less "flickery" while moving over objects (especially barred metal doors).
      · 4 replies
    • nbohr1more

      Please vote in the 15th Anniversary Contest Theme Poll
       
      · 0 replies
×
×
  • Create New...