I somewhat agree with the part about “making us dumber.” I try not to rely too heavily on AI or show cognitive surrender when using it. Especially when it comes to completely eliminating fact-checking. In my opinion, AI can certainly be used as a second opinion, but the decision ultimately comes down to you.
Lately, many people have been touting AI’s ability to boost productivity by 10x—including some of my acquaintances who’ve said the same thing. The “10x developer” buzzword, which has been around for a while, is starting to make more sense.
It’s undeniable that there are many types of AI, but I’m particularly concerned about these large language models (LLMs and gen AI). Back when buzzword like “deep learning,” , "reinforcement learning", “expert systems,” and “neural networks” were all the rage, it was clear that many people wanted to dive into the technical aspects especially the calculations behind them. AI development actually teaches you not to hate math like advanced statistics and when it comes to LLMs, there’s SFT, RM, and RLHF behind the scenes. But what’s worrying now is that many people I’ve met (including the developers mentioned earlier) have been more focused solely on the prompting aspect for generaive AI or LLM. Of course, people do tend to focus on specific areas of knowledge based on their needs so i cant fully blame them
Whenever people mention “Gen AI,” I always think of generative adversarial networks which were all the rage back in the 2015 and that just shows how out of touch and outdated I am with the world of AI (and this isn’t even my field). 2022-2026 AI progress is basically too much for me and hard to keep up
i am concerned with reassurance seeking and validation epidemic, Here's an article that's pretty close to that : When AI Becomes a Compulsion: Reassurance Chatting. Sometimes AI pleases you too much and i think they're optimized to please, not for the truth
Basically, I treat AI as a tool for executing mundane tasks and am aware of its limitations.