Jump to content
The Dark Mod Forums

lowenz

Member
  • Posts

    2458
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    15

Everything posted by lowenz

  1. Yes, 4 GB; "A new Job" mission. I don't think it's a VRAM limitation (150 MB difference).
  2. Just some performance report (i3 6300 + RX 570, lastest drivers)! Original resolution 2560x1440 Same settings but: 1) Stencil https://i.postimg.cc/qBXq3cvw/0.jpg 2) Maps https://i.postimg.cc/mDS4twyF/1.jpg
  3. lowenz

    Free games

    https://www.moddb.com/mods/ruiner (Riversin, not "Ruiner" the game)
  4. lowenz

    Free games

    You can always try Quake 2 XP https://www.moddb.com/mods/quake-2-xp -Q2 RTX "alternate" version: https://github.com/SkacikPL/Q2RTX/releases Ah, Epic Store got "Void Bastards" freethis week. It's the perfect roguelike IHMO
  5. lowenz

    Oh shit.

    You really seem incapable of realizing that a lot of REAL people want the so-called "extremism" (well not the one purely ideological-driven you have in your mind to bash in every thread you start but a dumbed-down version that surely IS DUMB but effectively answering to a lot of needs and desires - so maybe these 2 last things are the ones to work on, not a new occupation plans)
  6. lowenz

    Oh shit.

    How reality is simply non-sensical (from an ideological point of view) and grotesque:
  7. lowenz

    Oh shit.

    It's *NOT* the Sharia the main problem. From wiki. The Taliban's ideology has been described as combining an "innovative" form of sharia Islamic law based on Deobandi fundamentalism[99] and militant Islamism, combined[99] with Pashtun social and cultural norms known as Pashtunwali,[1][2][100][101] as most Taliban are Pashtun tribesmen + https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanafi
  8. lowenz

    Oh shit.

    The young ones. And the old ones - like the men - prefering the sharia? (indoctrinated since childhood and full of fear, sure, but you must take them in account too - and no, you can't "undo" old women or pretending they're not existing ) Just remember that exporting communism of Marx UK's vision to post-feudal Russia made the USSR the maelstrom we all know and the today Putin's Russia where the "democracy" is simply a straw man (Putin "democratic" vision is the same of Stalin with the Ortodox Christianity instead of Marxism). Maybe "exporting" values is one of the most stupid things to do. And not "maybe".
  9. lowenz

    Oh shit.

    All the things you say are NOT the real goal, the real goal is the extension of the market. Let apart that all those things when gained through violence are simply rejected. We're gonna need to re-invade Afghanistan. Another "troll" thread like the one on Islam? Or simply lack of sense of reality (the REAL reality, the one totally anti-idealistic and brutal but REAL).
  10. Now you're in the modder empyrean with Durante, Crosire, Kaldaien, ENB's Boris
  11. https://www.pcgamer.com/modder-adds-amd-fidelityfx-super-resolution-to-skyrim-vr-fallout-4-vr-and-more/ Any plan for a non-VR version @cabalistic ?
  12. Just make a law declaring police is uncorruptible so there is no curruption there
  13. Problem is: in a market-driven world this kind of dynamic is hard to fight an politician exploit it exactly because of that. Market+Tribal Nature= nearly unstoppable force
  14. You see? Make the law and they'll make some tricks to bypass the law thanks to another law.....and the state itself - in the officer person - does it! Freedom is really pointless if there's the state. A giant hoax to appease people
  15. Against the interest but sustaining their power fantasies. It's how you manipulate a tribal-minded right voter (in every state of this miserable world). And yes, they are happy with this, thanks to the criptospiritualism hidden behind right/far right ideologies.
  16. Catholic theocracy would be the SAME as iranian (Shi'a) one. Really really the same. So not bad as ISIS How/how much Franco's legacy is still in Spain today?
  17. "Businessman" -> "It's one of us, it's a hero fighgting for freedom against damn communists who want to take away our FREEDOM!!!111" (re-read my former words about "freedom fighters" engagement dynamics ) Really Kurshok, you are misundersting the reality and how it works beyond ideological propaganda words and "the law".
  18. There's no such thinks as "apologists", there's the petroldollars. Market world needs them. And heroin. About talibans, you know how talibans control the heroin production for the West? You search for "hypocrisy" (it's a psycho-ideological interpretation) but in reality there are only market and political interests. Islamic terrorism and "conservative way of life" is perfectly functional to these interests.
  19. The sovereignty resides in who already has actual power to wield and exert it thanks to popular consensus
  20. But "human rights" TODAY are not "intrinsic values" of mankind - the same stands for democratic values - but state/law-based.....so we get back to what I'm talking: POWER (->state/law) handling. Of course I stand for collaboration among ALL human beings - and it's why I love so much this community - but the state/law enforcement of this IMHO can't work: when you make the "collaboration" (or the social justice) a political goal.....you're building the foundations for a possibly hellish situation. And NOT because politicians are stupid, but because they are among the smartest bastards.
  21. Liberal representative democracy - from the power handling perspective - has finely tuned the consensus-based dictatorship mechanisms. The problem is not they're not perfect, the problem is they're TOO MUCH perfect at this "Freespeech" today is totally enslaved to politically-represented interest. We're NOT living in an Orwell-like authoritarian world (North Korea or similar states apart), we're living in a nightmarish Huxley-like society.
  22. Hate speech simply stands for "politically-exploitable-hate inspiring speech". All the question in its totality is nothing more than a political weapon (either the hate speech itself and the law against it) Either political wings can, alternately, be for or against the law (the dual scenario is to call "hate speech" any antinationalistic "self-hating" speech and fight the related "hate speech" law as a "resistence", as you can see in classical '900 fascist dictatorships with their censorship laws). They are really nothing more than tools to gain consensus. Thanks demo*N*cracy (or consensus-based dictatorships, being the representative democracy the evolution of the former ones from the power-handling perspective) to create these mind-manipulating conundrums. There are no "truths" here, only an everlasting consensus-seeking hunger from both sides, sometimes acting as rulers / elites, sometimes acting as freedom fighters / "small people" defenders. They're perfecty swappable on demand
×
×
  • Create New...