Jump to content
The Dark Mod Forums

TDM Standalone and MotY finally reported on TTLG

Subjective Effect

By Subjective Effect
in The Dark Mod

 Share

Recommended Posts

jtr7

jtr7

Posted
Posted (edited)

Time to change the front page menu at TTLG regarding Thief 4 "Anticipation", especially since it links to the Old T4 Discussion board.

Edited by jtr7

A skunk was badgered--the results were strong.

I hope that something better comes along.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Melan

Melan

Posted
Posted

I, for one, am still waiting for Thief 4 to be released. I hope it will be a good game! ;)

  • Like 1

Come the time of peril, did the ground gape, and did the dead rest unquiet 'gainst us. Our bands of iron and hammers of stone prevailed not, and some did doubt the Builder's plan. But the seals held strong, and the few did triumph, and the doubters were lain into the foundations of the new sanctum. -- Collected letters of the Smith-in-Exile, Civitas Approved

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jysk

jysk

Posted
Posted (edited)

I've tried to edit Wikipedia with regards to UK university info that I know to be true because I attended and know loads of people who have!

 

And it always gets reverted back to the wrong info so I just leave it.

 

Well you need to provide a source too; "everybody knows it" is not really sufficent.

 

The same is btw with TDM in the WP article. Of course it gets deleted if there is no proof for its notability in general article. How are they supposed to know. That guy is not an asshole or troll for demanding a simple reference that TDM is notable enough to warrant its name alongside Thief, Metal Gear Solid or Assassin's Creed. There is no need for calling names... Not everybody has heard of TDM and then for outsiders it just looks if someone wants to promote his pet project.

Edited by jysk
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jysk

jysk

Posted
Posted (edited)

Except it is notable, noteworthy, and because of that, has been published in several sources. This isn't about which reader or editor has personally noted it him- or herself.

 

Yes, We know that. For everyone else it is just an unproven claim on the Wikipage page about Stealth-Gaming because non of the sources have been added. And therefore gets deleted. Thats why he demanded a source. Now a source is there and it stays. No big deal in fact.

Edited by jysk
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ezze

ezze

Posted
Posted

Well... partially. That editor guy did act as an asshole, I cite his edit comment: "Sorry, not notable - feel free to show that it IS notable (burden is on you now, not on me). (TW))"

Instead of editing the wiki page and writing this log he could just type --the dark mod-- in google to see how notable the mod is. In order to add the missing citations. Even if he never heard of it before. Instead he acted as an arrogant freak with the approach "If I do not know, then it is not true".

 

On the other hand under the plethora of evidences he give up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...