Jump to content
The Dark Mod Forums

Lowend Challege: Get TDM 2.06 running on the oldest and slowest hardware


nbohr1more

Recommended Posts

 

I have this old shed sitting in a box, dont know if this the lowest machine spec so far-

 

Dell D410

  • Intel Pentium M 755 / 2 GHz
  • Mobile Intel 915GM Express
  • Intel GMA 900 - it only support OpenGL 1.4, what the min requirement for 2.06..?
  • Windows Xp, but I may put linux on there.
  • 1024*768 screen, but it barley runs T2 @ 800*600

 

 

That won't even run Doom 3. GMA 900 has "No Hardware T&L" support.

 

The only way that would work is with a wrapper like LLVM:

 

http://forums.thedarkmod.com/topic/17867-compiled-llvmpipesoftpipe-for-windows/

 

but an i3 gets 2FPS in New Job as I recall so...

 

Well. I guess you could possibly install an express card or external GPU of some sort.

Please visit TDM's IndieDB site and help promote the mod:

 

http://www.indiedb.com/mods/the-dark-mod

 

(Yeah, shameless promotion... but traffic is traffic folks...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Latest build is a small form factor with a GTX750TI. Not particularly slow or old, but definitely a budget card. I find that the game runs great at 720p with soft shadow quality at 40. If you don't want soft shadows, you can use 1080p. But soft shadows and 1080p tend to slow things down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Windows 7 Professional Service Pack 1

32 bit (x86)

Intel Core 2 Duo CPU E7500 2.93 GHz

2,00 GB RAM

GeForce 9600 GSO 512

Edited by Petike the Taffer
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

I tried it on a Pentium M 725 notebook with 855GM chipset graphics and a whopping 512MB of DDR RAM but it only supports OpenGL 1.3. On Windows XP, TDM shows an initialization error and on Linux (antiX), it reaches the main menu with a black screen due to shader compilation errors. According to the console output, it does seem to support GLSL 1.1 and 1.2 but TDM requires 1.3 even with glsl shaders disabled. Didn't really expect it to run properly though. :ph34r:

 

Anyway, I also have an Atom x5-Z8350 board with 4GB RAM. It isn't quite old but it is quite slow. The last time I tried, it had <=15fps iirc but I will take a look at other maps and settings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but I will take a look at other maps and settings.

http://forums.thedarkmod.com/topic/19498-image-downsize-in-206/

"I really perceive that vanity about which most men merely prate — the vanity of the human or temporal life. I live continually in a reverie of the future. I have no faith in human perfectibility. I think that human exertion will have no appreciable effect upon humanity. Man is now only more active — not more happy — nor more wise, than he was 6000 years ago. The result will never vary — and to suppose that it will, is to suppose that the foregone man has lived in vain — that the foregone time is but the rudiment of the future — that the myriads who have perished have not been upon equal footing with ourselves — nor are we with our posterity. I cannot agree to lose sight of man the individual, in man the mass."...

- 2 July 1844 letter to James Russell Lowell from Edgar Allan Poe.

badge?user=andarson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

A bit off topic but it's probably the least inappropriate thread to post this

 

I did a RAM upgrade on my laptop and took a chance to benchmark memory controller

 

The hardware is dual-core i7-6000 something, intel 540 IGP, DDR4-2133

 

IIRC with just one 8GB memory stick I was seeing something like 48 fps in the Rightful Property inn scene

8GB + 4GB it was something like 52 fps and 8GB + 8GB was probably the same, possibly one extra fps but I wouldn't bet my hand on it.

 

Does not prove anything, but I'd say if you have a dedicated GPU you shouldn't expect visible difference between single and double channel memory modes.

An IGP always benefits from double channeling but my specific model has a eDRAM chip which supposedly makes it somewhat less memory limited. On the other hands 'regular' IGP's sans dedicated buffers might or might not be bottlenecked by their limited ROP's and shader power.

A lot of points to speculate about such as cache trashing and memory latency influence on CPU/GPU memory access fighting.

 

In the end, it's always better to have dedicated over IGP, double channel over single, eDRAM over nothing, DDR4 over DDR3, more shaders over fewer shaders, and be rich and healthy over poor and sick.

 

That concludes my report. Thank you for your time

 

BTW I heard that Intel decided that 64-MB eDRAM 'ought to be enough for anybody'

Using the default shadow map settings we end up with the global shadow atlas texture size of 144MB. High-quality (2K pages) shadows result in ~600MB texture.

Great thinking, Intel, as always (not).

I'd buy an AMD IGP if they had a budget model with some on-chip buffer but they don't do that at all. And AMD sucks in just as many ways as Intel. Looking back all the way to i810 chipsets, IGP's have been constant pain, more or less so depending on the specific model. 810, 845, ati XPRESS, X3100, HD 3000, 5500, 540, they all sucked in their own way.

Does not matter if it's 2000, 2010, or 2020. If you want ANY 3D, buy dedicated GPUs

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the end, it's always better to have dedicated over IGP, double channel over single, eDRAM over nothing, DDR4 over DDR3, more shaders over fewer shaders, and be rich and healthy over poor and sick.”

 

„Does not matter if it's 2000, 2010, or 2020. If you want ANY 3D, buy dedicated GPUs”

Indeed, I imagine though most people who are on a buget and are getting a Celeron, will be disinterested in 3D. They just need a newer model that will last longer without the need to throw this laptop sooner than later. That includes cleaning it occasionally from dust. Too easy to have a Good game for your motherboard from overheating and so on.

And why reinvent the wheel on being rich?

„The acquisition of riches has been for many men, not an end, but a change, of troubles.”

― Seneca, Letters From A Stoic: Epistulae Morales

"I really perceive that vanity about which most men merely prate — the vanity of the human or temporal life. I live continually in a reverie of the future. I have no faith in human perfectibility. I think that human exertion will have no appreciable effect upon humanity. Man is now only more active — not more happy — nor more wise, than he was 6000 years ago. The result will never vary — and to suppose that it will, is to suppose that the foregone man has lived in vain — that the foregone time is but the rudiment of the future — that the myriads who have perished have not been upon equal footing with ourselves — nor are we with our posterity. I cannot agree to lose sight of man the individual, in man the mass."...

- 2 July 1844 letter to James Russell Lowell from Edgar Allan Poe.

badge?user=andarson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recent Status Updates

    • Ansome

      Finally got my PC back from the shop after my SSD got corrupted a week ago and damaged my motherboard. Scary stuff, but thank goodness it happened right after two months of FM development instead of wiping all my work before I could release it. New SSD, repaired Motherboard and BIOS, and we're ready to start working on my second FM with some added version control in the cloud just to be safe!
      · 0 replies
    • Petike the Taffer  »  DeTeEff

      I've updated the articles for your FMs and your author category at the wiki. Your newer nickname (DeTeEff) now comes first, and the one in parentheses is your older nickname (Fieldmedic). Just to avoid confusing people who played your FMs years ago and remember your older nickname. I've added a wiki article for your latest FM, Who Watches the Watcher?, as part of my current updating efforts. Unless I overlooked something, you have five different FMs so far.
      · 0 replies
    • Petike the Taffer

      I've finally managed to log in to The Dark Mod Wiki. I'm back in the saddle and before the holidays start in full, I'll be adding a few new FM articles and doing other updates. Written in Stone is already done.
      · 4 replies
    • nbohr1more

      TDM 15th Anniversary Contest is now active! Please declare your participation: https://forums.thedarkmod.com/index.php?/topic/22413-the-dark-mod-15th-anniversary-contest-entry-thread/
       
      · 0 replies
    • JackFarmer

      @TheUnbeholden
      You cannot receive PMs. Could you please be so kind and check your mailbox if it is full (or maybe you switched off the function)?
      · 1 reply
×
×
  • Create New...