Jump to content
The Dark Mod Forums

Noisemaker Concepts


god_is_my_goldfish

Recommended Posts

Just to get this out in the open, house guards should be MUCH more likely to spend time sniffing around a noise arrow than other guards, and perhaps elite ones actually DO start looking for where it came to after a few seconds pause.

 

Given our stim-response system, different AI can react in different ways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Just to get this out in the open, house guards should be MUCH more likely to spend time sniffing around a noise arrow than other guards, and perhaps elite ones actually DO start looking for where it came to after a few seconds pause.

 

Given our stim-response system, different AI can react in different ways.

yeah - I love the idea that elite guards aren't distracted by noisemakers.

Just imagine a situation:

"Hah, you damn bastard thought you can distract me with your little toys ? Come out you taffer ! I'll find ya " :D

Edited by BlackThief
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyway IMHO the shattering glass is the best option - it's easy for us to create it and it will look good ingame and it makes perfect sense. shattering glass in the night is loud, but not as load as fireworks - a firework would attract guard from the other end of the mansion - and that's certainly not what our thief is looking forward to....

It's also a good attempt to keep a common theme amongst the arrows. It's sudden and jarring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's also a good attempt to keep a common theme amongst the arrows. It's sudden and jarring.

Well a shattering glass sound could work. And it might even be a good explanation why the guard will be distracted for some time. After all, if you hear shattering glass in a museum at night, the guard WILL have to investigate.

 

But what about dungeons or caves? The T2 noisemaker is versatile, because it doesn't rely on an environment.

Gerhard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

THere is no kind of projectile you could use to distract a guard at 3am in a museum that would not be suspicious.

IT doesn't matter what the nosie is, it's the fact that the projectile would be lying there at the source.

This is why the best solution is the simplest - use whatever you find in your environment to distract the guards with, by definition it cannot be out of place there.

Civillisation will not attain perfection until the last stone, from the last church, falls on the last priest.

- Emil Zola

 

character models site

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, we're going to have that option. But we still need a noise arrow. :) But since guards don't get suspicious about water arrows, they don't need to get suspicious about noise ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not quite the same thing with water arrows. If you use a water arrow on a torch where no guard can hear it, then you can either assume that the thief picks it up again, or it isn't noticed, because the area where the arrow fell is now dark.

IF you put a torch out near a guard, then he should definitely invesigate and act as though he knows someone has just dowsed it on purpose.

With noise arrows, you're deliberately directing the guard towards your arrow, and announcing you are there.

 

We don't actually 'need' noise arrows if we are having an alternate solution. They are not a good idea. It seems the only reason to include them is because they were in the original games. That's not a particularly satisfactory argument.

Civillisation will not attain perfection until the last stone, from the last church, falls on the last priest.

- Emil Zola

 

character models site

Link to comment
Share on other sites

god_is_my_goldfish, and anyone ELSE who decides to quote from memory, should read the Desicions Thread (totally readable, even though its currently pending a re-format). I took the time and effort to summarise the discussions so that the outcome was CLEAR AND CONSICE, even providing a link for each topic to the thread where the discussion occured.

 

Noise arrows are re-usable, or they're worthless.

 

And a wind-up clockwork noisemaker (the kind found in the ORIGINAL T2 game), is the best option, since it's totally reasonable to assume Garrett winds it up again, when he picks it up, or before he fires it. And it would be loud. I don't see the point in changing this concept.

 

And one more thing - sorry, but I find it annoying that people who don't even USE noise arrows at all, let alone as exclusively as I do, think that they can make well-informed statements on how noise arrows should work.

 

Just to get this out in the open, house guards should be MUCH more likely to spend time sniffing around a noise arrow than other guards, and perhaps elite ones actually DO start looking for where it came to after a few seconds pause.

 

Given our stim-response system, different AI can react in different ways.

Good stuff. I like it.

Edited by Domarius
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't actually 'need' noise arrows if we are having an alternate solution. They are not a good idea. It seems the only reason to include them is because they were in the original games. That's not a particularly satisfactory argument.

 

We've already decided this. We will include both options, so that FM authors that like noise arrows can use them, and those that don't won't have to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*heavy sigh*

 

Note post above yours.

 

I think this is posted in at LEAST four different threads now....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AND THE OUTCOME AND REASONS WHY ARE ALREADY DOCUMENTED!! READ IT, PEOPLE!!

 

:blink:

 

BTW, in case you missed it, this IS a direct link to the Noise Arrow Outcome post.

 

And here it is again, just in case.

 

I think "The Grand Desicion Thread" is the best kept secret on the entire forum.

 

 

 

This thread is called "Noise Maker Concepts". Any discussion as to the usefulness or workings of the noise arrow should be started in a new thread, AFTER reading this policy first.

 

Back onto Noise Maker Concepts, HOPEFULLY...

 

As much as I appreciate the thought (and illustration time) that has gone into Springheel's ball bearing one, I really think that the original clockwork concept from T2 is great, and doesn't need to be changed.

 

It could be loud, it's re-usable (we can assume it's wound up when retrieved or before firing), and it's beleivable.

 

The only valid question raised against this concept, that I can remember, was by sparhawk, that it wasn't confusing enough to warrant the guards attention for so long. (Ball bearings wouldn't be any different.)

But with the recent idea of elite guards not paying so much attention to them, and the fact they worked so well in T2, I don't see why the concept should be changed.

Edited by Domarius
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was clockwork? All it did was get fired and go waaaoooo waaaoooo. I assumed the arrow was shaped so that it caused sound waves to come off it.

Don't know what version of Thief you were playing, but in T2, it makes clicking noises and some obviously clockwork wirr-ing noises.

 

The stuff that comes off of it in the air is hardly the thing that makes the AI interested, since it spends most of its time sitting on the ground wirr-ing and clicking, and THAT'S where the AI heads.

 

The circles that come off of it in the air are just some special effects for the player's benifit. If it was sound, it'd give your position away. If it was visible, it'd give your position away even more.

 

Yes, there's going to be some disbeleif, but I still feel this is the most "beleivable" idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't know what version of Thief you were playing, but in T2, it makes clicking noises and some obviously clockwork wirr-ing noises.

I never noticed that. :lol:

 

I always thought that the circles represented the noise it made and which is what the a Ai is after. I never bothered to retrieve, so I never noticed that they made noise after landing. :)

Gerhard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that's the way to go. I like Domarius's wind-up idea as a way to make them reusable. So some kind of simple clockwork device, preferably not very big. And put it up the shaft a couple inches, so it isn't directly impacting when it lands. Thanks GIMG.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recent Status Updates

    • Petike the Taffer

      I've finally managed to log in to The Dark Mod Wiki. I'm back in the saddle and before the holidays start in full, I'll be adding a few new FM articles and doing other updates. Written in Stone is already done.
      · 4 replies
    • nbohr1more

      TDM 15th Anniversary Contest is now active! Please declare your participation: https://forums.thedarkmod.com/index.php?/topic/22413-the-dark-mod-15th-anniversary-contest-entry-thread/
       
      · 0 replies
    • JackFarmer

      @TheUnbeholden
      You cannot receive PMs. Could you please be so kind and check your mailbox if it is full (or maybe you switched off the function)?
      · 1 reply
    • OrbWeaver

      I like the new frob highlight but it would nice if it was less "flickery" while moving over objects (especially barred metal doors).
      · 4 replies
    • nbohr1more

      Please vote in the 15th Anniversary Contest Theme Poll
       
      · 0 replies
×
×
  • Create New...