Jump to content
The Dark Mod Forums

woah

Member
  • Posts

    395
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by woah

  1. woah

    Asheron's Call

    What is it that the eight million or so people that play World of Warcraft see in the game? Obviously most of the players are not from old MMO descent; somehow they attracted a new crowd of gamers. The game has many aspects of instant gratification, and perhaps this is why I see so many Counter-Strike gamers involved. My fear is that developers may attempt to model future MMO's on World of Warcraft
  2. woah

    Asheron's Call

    Ah, I've tried World of Warcraft, but it's much too straightforward and un-challenging for my tastes; it's much too streamlined. I can understand why one would switch considering AC's current state, though.
  3. woah

    Asheron's Call

    Awesome, nice to hear from someone who actually played the game--let alone has heard of it. I remember attempting to collect shards and get "GSA" (Greater Shadow Armor). But I quit before I could complete my set. I never let anyone help me collect them; I always liked the challenge of doing it all on my own. My friend always told me about another set of shadow armor which was extremely rare; I'm guessing that was what GSC was. Shoushi is where I originated too--specifically on an outpost about a half of a mile from the town, and then moved on to Eastham. After probably about a month of hunting on the Eastham beach and the adjacent fields and forests, taking down such feats as Azure Gromnies, Drudge Prowlers and Drudge Slinkers, Red Phyntos Wasps, and many different blazons of Shreths, I somehow found my way back to Shoushi, and--in the midst of one of my random explorations in that area--found what would become a memorable area. I ventured up a long incline and onto a mountainous ridge. It was here that I found a player, Troll the Destroyer, who would later become my patron after weeks of hunting in this locale with one another. Various forms of Zeffirs, Rats, Wisps, White mattekars, stone throwing Lugians (of which could consume about half of your health with one hit of a rock), and other such creatures were the primary game in this area. Everything else afterwards is just a haze, but I can recall some memorable areas as the "Lugian Citadel," a dungeon infested with hundreds of Lugians, of many different forms, and the hunting the ferocious and rare "Dread Mattekars," (of which--if you were lucky--had about a 98/100 chance of dropping a mattekar hide that could be formed into a wieldable "Mattekar Claw." Unfortunately, I think I only came across about 20 of these dread mattekars in game, but that made the excitement of finding one and actually being able to take it down tremendous) on the snowy mountains behind the Citadel's entrance. Afterwards, I remember just spending months of play wandering about in the deserts, establishing temporary hunting grounds in such areas as "Zaikhal" (sp?), "Tufa," and "Yaraq," exploring some skeleton infested catacombs and such. When I was a high enough level, I moved on to "Fort Tethana," a stronghold far out in the Direlands, which happened to be where I spent most of my ingame time, and which is where I would depart. I always wanted to attempt to venture out to Teth on foot alone (without the usage of portals), but--even at level 50--it was so dangerous in the direlands I had trouble taking one creature at a time. Unfortunately, the developers ruined the game for me before I could accomplish this, or experience any of the thousands of other areas in Dereth. But I'm rambling again.
  4. I do believe one's light-gem should be affected by leaning, but I believe it should be less than normal if you are not protruded too far around a bend.
  5. woah

    Asheron's Call

    How does the text-based interface work? I've never tried one myself, and I didn't even know they existed. Getting conditioned to a non-graphical game and game-interface would seem quite a challenge
  6. woah

    Asheron's Call

    Haha, didn't realize that was so long lol. I just started rambling and I couldn't get myself to stop. I assume I had so much to say because I played Asheron's Call as if it were a "second life," and, indeed, it felt like one . Actually, what I provided was a rather brief summary of the game; there is so much more I would have liked to say about the game's features, atmosphere, and my personal experiences, but it's a matter of trying to effectively put it into words. EDIT: By the way, I just want to know: How many of you had even heard of Asheron's Call (NOT Asheron's Call 2) before I posted this? I'm just curious. I don't believe Turbine or Microsoft advertised the game even once. All the players it gained were solely accumulated by word of mouth, yet it spread like wild fire between the groups of gamers that knew about it. And part of its relatively low peak subscription-base came as a result of it only being offered through Microsoft's "Zone" games service, which was quite confusing to utilize as a new player. Had it been advertised, I can bet the 120,000 large playerbase would have at least doubled. Asheron's Call 2 was a horrible sequel that died within a meager few years of its release; Asheron's Call 1 has long out lived it. I will save you mental pain by not expounding upon it; it relinquished everything that was good about its predecessor, and destroyed any hope of further the Asheron's Call games.
  7. woah

    Asheron's Call

    Are there, perhaps, any Asheron's Call veterans around this forum? I use to play the MMO back in 2000 and 2001. In short, I loved the game, and I doubt there exists a game which I have enjoyed as much to this day. Asheron's Call (AC) was very unique. Every detail of the game seamlessly conformed to an utmost alluring and extraordinary fantasy theme, unlike any other. It didn't follow the depreciated "elves, trolls, dwarves, and dragons" cliche, but rather had it's own particular form of fantasy. AC had "Gromnies," the mysterious "Virindi," the simple-minded "Drudges," "Golems," the ever feared "Shadows," "Banderlings," "Sclavus," "Monougas," "Mattekars," the brutish, humanoid "Lugians," "Phyntos Wasps," and vast, countless other forms of inhabitants. All of these creatures resided in an enormous and seamless, 575 square mile large game-world known as "Dereth," a landmass extremely varied and mysterious. One could spend real-world days simply journeying afoot across its vast expanse of grasslands, forests, mires, deserts, beaches, rolling hills, mountaineous ridges, and snowy peaks (not to mention its seemingly unlimited magnitude of dungeons, catacombs, and caves), venturing about and perhaps stumbling upon unexplored areas. Each of the game's widespread locales had a particular atmosphere and dwelling of inhabitants. A newly arrived adventurer would find comfort in the relatively unscathed eastern territories of "Middle Osteth," harboring numerous consoling and populated towns of the likes of "Eastham" and "Cragstone," and with a wide variety of critters that gradually, but moderately grew more and more vicous the farther one distanced themselves from a trail. But those daring and battle-hardened could venture into the unexplored and feared "Direlands" in the distant west, where in the most ferocious and erratic creatures lingered and the refuge of fortress or commune did not exist for a hundred miles or more. Map A player had the choice of selecting one of three races, all of which were part of a congomerate "Isparian" race (essentially a human): The "Aluvians" (Caucasian), the "Gharu'ndim" (Negro), and the "Sho" (Asian), each of which had different inherent advantages, but which were generally insignificant in difference. In stark contrast to the "cookie-cutter" MMO's of today (IE: World of Warcraft), in Asheron's Call each and every player was unique. The facial customizations alone were so extensive one could go several years into the game without ever finding two players with the same set of characteristics (and there were different facial sets for each race), and this is not taking into consideration the varieties of skin tone, and hair color and style. Though, most importantly, not only were players defined unique in their appearance, but most especially in their player-defined attributes. The skill system is still probably the most extensive and well-designed out of all MMO's to date *1*, and there were so many forms of armor, weapons, gems, jewerly, clothing-attire, special-loot items, and other articles (5 years later, in this day and time, the item-set selection has likely doubled) that I do not believe I had ever come across a set of players who looked even remotely alike, or even two items that were exactly alike for that matter. Items were randomly generated in their appearance, worth, weight, color, special-affects, and usage-requirements upon defeating an adversary *2*. Overall, though, what I enjoyed most about this game was its challenge, longevity, and vastness, and this is the same area in which the game met its downfall. Early on in Asheron's Call (back when I played), it obliged at least two years or so to reach the maximum level--level 126. This estimation is solely for those who played in a mode of consistent hunting ("powerlevelers"), ignoring the many other features of the game, such as trading, questing, alchemy, spell research *3*, fishing, exploration, cooking, and "lore-research" *4*. In addition to these, one might also spend their pastime aside from hunting straightforwardly socializing with the wonderful community Asheron's Call had. AC's design encouraged socializing and cooperation between players of all levels, through certain personal benefits one could capitalize on. Aside from the obvious advantage of traveling in numbers, players who formed fellowships would be granted experience rewards. Likewise, the game touted a novel allegiance system, where in players could form patron/vassal relationships: Lower level players could swear allegiance to a higher level patron, in which they would thereafter become their vassal. The patron would be responsible for providing the vassal with items, knowledge, and personal assistance (all the while competing with the offers of other patrons), whereas they would personally receive a percentage of experience gained by the vassal in return. On the same token, Asheron's Call was just as suited to solo play as it was to cooperative. I know for a fact, as I personally enjoyed individualistic play in substitute to aggregate during my years. One was highly capable of perservering on their own means, not depending on the services of others. This was relatively more challenging, but, as a result, much more gratifying in the end--once accomplishing something. Though, this is not to say I never involved myself with others in AC. It's not often that you find an MMO in which a good portion of players have a friendly and non-rival decency about them, and a quality beyond a tiresome droning towards acheiving the highest level or finding the most popular, highest-experience hunting spots. For mellow players such as these (a good handlful of them were roleplayers), it would have probably taken much longer than two years to reach a high level like 126, but I do not believe such a feat was much of their concern. And, even so, the level cap did not have much significance *5*. This longetivity is one of the primary reasons I enjoyed Asheron's Call; the game seemed to never end. AC didn't necessitate a minuscule duration of two weeks to a month in order to "complete" the game, as is with many newer MMOs. And it was not as if level progression was a slow and tedious task without recompense. Had this been the case, there would have not been a point in dedicating so much time to the game in the first place. Rather, Asheron's Call was more of an adventure filled with much variety *6*, mystification *7*, and peculiarly random events *8*. And with the monthly content updates and live events the game received, in addition to the huge content base established at the release of the game, it would have been quite a feat (in other words, if you "have a life" outside of the game, outright impossible) to experience every bit of content the game offered to its players. But, alas, nothing this good could last for even a few years. The developers of Asheron's Call, insistent on ever improving their game, took to the likes of an aweful development scheme, in which they turned to their players for development/modification concepts. One might think this is a reasonable idea, but--as it turns out--players do not really know what they want. I can specifically remember the day when "Pyreals," Asheron's Call's form of ingame currency, became burdenless (Yes, characters were affected by the weight of items, depending on the level of their strength attribute). At first, this was a change that I didn't think much of. It was welcoming in that my character's movement was much faster, but, at the same time, it was surprisingly disapointing not having to worry about storing or carrying pyreals and my other various items strategically. I was oblivious to the motives of such a decision, and I didn't bother questioning them at the time as I had figured they were insignificant. Little did I know that this was the beginning of a whole slew of gameplay-altering changes that would ruin Asheron's Call. The next thing I knew, portals leading to virtually everywhere in the game were emerging all about the world of Dereth. Players had complained of needing to travel on foot to various locations in the game, and the developers--ignorant to the consequences--acted accordingly. Had they simply pondered the fact that eliminating any bit of necessary on-foot travel would render all of the inbetween land masses useless and entirely desolate, and dismiss all prospects of the once natural adventure that occurred in between such areas, I doubt they would have considered such decisions. I can recall traveling in fellowships across the huge Dereth landmass, depending on one another for "survival." It was quite an experience to say the least. But now all it took was one step into a swirling-portal and I was immediately at my intended destination. It was simply a shortcut to the prize; there was now no journey involved, and the "journey" or challenge--to many people's ignorance--is what makes a game fun. It was only a matter of time before other decisions and modifications of the same blazons arised. Players decided the extremely unique and intriguing spell research system*3* was only a nuisance, resolving that all spells should simply be bought at an NPC in the form of scrolls available in all towns. Persistent spell durations, previously lasting between five and eight minutes, uniformily began lasting twenty to even thirty minutes. The usage of ingame plugins were condoned, and as such "buff bots," non-player assisted "bots"--controlled by cleverly designed macros--offered all characters augmentations unintended for their rank, allowing them to hunt in areas not nearly intended for their level (this resulted in overly fast-paced character progression and unchallenging experience acquisition. Buff Bots are now treated as an ingrained "part of the game," and all new players are sadly encouraged to use them). "Double-Experience" weekends were introduced at whim if there was any sort of downtime (as the players could use this as an excuse). Drop rates of once rare items now surfaced on every other corpse. Many other miscellaneous and once challenging features of the game followed suit, and would either removed or castrated like the others. It was about this time that I left the game. As a result of all these nonsensical changes, the game had become rather boring and monotonous. There is no entertainment in obtaining a reward if there is no effort involved to obtain it. Three years after, I returned for a day or two to see what had become of the game, and it was even worse than before. Instead of the steady, yet enthralling leveling pace of two years to reach the highest level, give or take a few months, one could reach level 126 in a mere month or two--less if you were experienced in AC. As a result, 80% of the game's unique and classic content--of which had been designed for the previous gradual progression--could now be rushed through quite instantly. Much of the "hunting" areas, dungeons, quests, exploration, and great experiences once occurring in this content might as well have been removed. Pyreals, formerly having substantial value, were now a common place in that they dropped excessively on all creatures, and in that loot sold from creatures was amended with extravagant payback (whereas the price of items sold hardly changed). It was as if the developers really believed there was some merit behind the thoughtless rants of complainers, as though there was some public good beyond their obviously selfish intents to simply augment their alter egos. And from all of this, probably the worst of all changes transpired within the community: the Unattended Combat Macro (UCM). Expectedly, Asheron's Call--a once intriguing, immensily fun, and challenging game--had become boring. As a result, players decided that if the game was not fun, then why play it at all? In fact, why not simply run a program that would play the game for me, allowing me to continually advance 24 hours a day, without any effort? So, nowadays (as I hear anyways), 50% of the active population on each server is not actually "active," but more or less just some script repeating itself in a far off dungeon. Knowing what the game had once been, and what its further potential could have been, it is really sad to hear the cries of new players consistently complaining on the Asheron's Call forums about never once seeing another player in all their time in the game. It is estimated that there is about 150-250 players active, half of which are bots, on each of the 7 AC servers at high times. I can personally recall when the active server population rarely dipped below 1,800 on every server. 'Tis a sad story. *1*(In the year and a half that I played, there were more than 30 skills to choose from, including but definitely not limited to such things as "War Magic," "Missile Defense," "Life Magic," "Cooking," "Dagger," "Staff," "Archery," "Alchemy," "Arcane Lore," "Jump," "Deception," "Mana Conversion," "Unarmed Combat," "Sword," "Run," and on and on. The player had the option of training or--in a further advancement to training--"specializing" in any of these skills, depending on how they utilized their "skill-credits," and, afterwards, spending experience on whatever they preferred accordingly. In addition, the player was given "attributes," a base form of stats (in a different category than the skills system) which encompassed such things as "Strength," "Endurance," "Focus," "Coordination," "Health," "Quickness," and so on. All of these decisions based around XP and skill credit allocation affected how your character would turn out--not just in the beginning of the game, but all throughout. Your decisions affected, for example, further experience costs, special-items requirements, and such. There wasn't simply a "Sorcerer" class where every other "Sorcerer" was virtually the same character as your "Sorcerer," give or take a few minor differences. You were completely unique.) *2*(In addition, and most interestingly, recently I heard the developers introduced a "Rares" system, in which each player has the capacity to receive a randomly dropped "rare" loot item belonging to one of seven or so tiers of rares. The higher end tiers of rares, albiet quite hard to attain, are completely unique in the game, meaning they have entirely custom-designed models and special abilities, solely attainable by one player.) *3*(Initially, the role of a mage was quite novel in Asheron's Call. There were seven tiers of spells attainable in the game, and additional levels would render themselves usable as you progressed in a specific profession. From what I can recall, of these seven levels, for each of the magical professions of "Life Magic," "Creature Enchantment," "War Magic," and "Item Enchantment," there existed a vast collection of spells. Most were uniform across each of the seven levels in their type and affect, simply growing stronger and lasting for longer durations at higher levels (For instance, there was a "Flamebolt IV," "Flamebolt V," "Flame Arc IV," Flame Streak IV," "Frost Bolt VI," etc"). But there were so many variations and types--probably amounting to several hundred, and each had a tactical use. Far from generic or boring on there own, these spells were supplemented by special sets of entirely unique forms of spells, each of which had individualistic affects and animations. For every spell in the game, there existed "spell components" which would need to be combined in order to cast and learn a spell, and this is where "Spell Research" came into play. The spell components that founded these spells took the form of "Scarabs," "Herbs," "Powdered Gems," "Alchemical Substances," "Talismans," and "Tapers," each of which was compromized of a group of several dozen variations. Some types were extremely rare and valuable--naturally needed for higher-end, powerful spells, others were simply commonplace, and many were somewhere inbetween. Following a formal pattern of combination, the player would need to test combinations of components in order to contrive spells. The combinations for each of these spells were unique for every player, so one could not simply divulge their entire spellbook to their fellow. In addition, spells could also be learned by spell scrolls found in loot, though higher end ones were naturally rare. *4*(The game had its own arrangement of extremly extensive lore and story, in which players could attain texts and valuable information in the form of books, scripts, tomes, or straightforward NPC-communication, revealing the hidden facts about Dereth and its history/mysteries. Such findings might disclose secret quests, the whereabouts of a scroll for some unique and powerful spell, the appropriate combinations of extraordinary or seemingly useless loot in order to form some peculiar item, the secretive dwellings of a certain horribly powerful and legendary monster, or perhaps the lore divulged would simply be another piece of Dereth's expansive puzzle of history.) *5*(The level cap did not have much significance anyways, beyond the fact that one couldn't attain additional skill credits used in training new skills; you could still increase your skills and attributes with experience gained afterwards.) *6*(For instance, there were hundreds of different grounds of exploration and hunting. So many that even with the 120,000 large player-base in the game's peak, many far-off areas--aside from the popular and ever-changing hunting locales--were often almost or altogether abandoned, which would evoke a sort of mystical feeling of adventure--not knowing what might be around the next bend of a cavern wall or what treasure may have existed in a chest at the depths of some dungeon.) *7*(Often throughout Asheron's Call's history, developers of the game would hint at the fact that they would secretly implement much content kept disclosed from the regularly released patch's feature list. And indeed they did, as such peculiarities would emerge regularly. According to developer chats, even to this day--in addition to normaly adding such curiousities--some content back from the early 2000's has yet to be discovered.) *8*(I can recall such spontaneous events as monsters, having defeated several players, leveling far past their base level, becoming quite powerful of foes, or random raids of 30 or so of a certain creature on some town, for example.)
  8. What would you recommend I start with? I have a lot of unemployed time on my hands this summer, and I am enthusiastic about learning learning the "nitty, gritty" details--especially if it will improve the efficiency of my programming. The only problem is I cannot learn such large topics directly through the internet, as there is only one "internet-capable" computer in my house (My particular satellite service cannot be networked. Well, I suppose it can, but the tutorials I have found have either been removed or do not work), and it is also a family shared PC. I would need to learn through books--which I would prefer to staring at a screen for my eyes' sake anyways. EDIT: I forgot to mention that I started reading the Thinking in C++, 2nd Edition text by Bruce Eckel yesterday. I'm already understanding certain topics much more thoroughly.
  9. A perfect example of this is Counter-Strike: Source. Funny how a game released in 2003 doesn't get a complete set of models and maps (in other words, become a complete game) until late 2005, early 2006. Yet, even half way through 2006, the game is still riddled with bugs. Never play that game myself, though (I hate it). Steam is simply a money making tool. It was formed to force products in front of all the millions of inelastic Counter-Strike players (Valve's intended host), all who would have faired just fine had they no further knowledge of other games. I'm quite positive Counter-Strike would still be getting content upgrades even today had Steam not been introduced. Valve knew a game that could be obtained freely would not be very profitable on their behalf, even after which they acquired and started selling it for $20 in stores. With a big push from Steam, they could introduce Counter-Strike: Source and Condition Zero. This was a perfect excuse to neglect updating the popular game of Counter-Strike, effectively boring the Counter-Strike players out of their minds with 3 year old content. So where do these players turn once they're dead tired of playing with the same damn weapons, maps, models, and other content in Counter-Strike? Counter-Strike: Condition Zero and Counter-Strike: Source, of course! (you know, those two games Valve incessently spammed Steam-users with at log-in?) Valve is effectively killing the Counter-Strike community so they can reap profits of their own. Had Counter-Strike been given its natural progression of updates, I can assure you the 60,000 statistic of players of which switched to the poor CS substitute known as "Counter-Strike: Source" would be much less. There is no god damn reason to stop updating the content of a game with a consistent in-game population that rarely dips below 120,000 (and this is based on today's statistics--not those lured into CSS and CS:CZ). There were other motives involved.
  10. woah

    Bioshock

    Those Doom 3 outdoor environments look awesome, yet I am curious as to how they perform.
  11. Lol. They used Counter-Strike sounds for the weapons.
  12. I feel so inferior among you renaissance men
  13. woah

    Bioshock

    True, my definition of "decent" is quite unconventional. I'm not sure why. I mainly just up the graphics detail settings myself. I always run at 800x600 and never enable AF, AA or v-sync, as the marginal difference in performance is too large given the slight improvements in graphics quality. I'm not really sure what my problem is with HL2. It may just be my A64 3000+ processor. I know HL2 is very cpu-intensive.
  14. woah

    Bioshock

    Well, "decent" is a subjective term, and I suppose what I ment by "decent" is a card that can run the latest games on highest detail with a constant FPS above or equal to ~50 (In other words, your expected console performance). I bought a Geforce 7600GT a few weeks ago, and it cost me $200, yet I definitely wouldn't consider it "decent" given my FPS crawls below 50 more than not. Despite the fact that I always run 800x600 for the extra frames per second, the card has trouble with new and several year old games (HL2). I don't really expect next year's to be playable on it.
  15. woah

    Bioshock

    I use to be a console gamer. I loved Twisted Metal 2, Metal Gear Solid, Driver, Tony Hawk's Pro Skater (original), Vigilante 8, and Syphon Filter. Then a friend of mine introduced me to PC games and internet play, and it blew my mind. I came into the PC world with Team Fortress Classic, I could never go back to consoles afterwards. Nowadays, despite the fact that I'm still quite adept with the controlling-scheme of consoles, playing them just feels awkward and uneventful; I feel like I'm more or less spectating something rather than all around manipulating it. But it all boils down to the controlling scheme and game complexity for me, as it does for many others. The extent of manipulation one can attain with keyboard and mouse is my main favorability. The PS3 is grabbing my attention with its pre-installed linux, open source development, and Keyboard and Mouse support. Quite powerful too. It's going to take PCs a while to catch up to the PS3. Although PC's may have better specifications on paper, actual in game performance is a different story (Even nowadays the Xbox360 can render moderately detailed games like Oblivion and Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced War Fighter much better than a high-end, $6000 PC can). Not to mention, decent graphics cards are freaking expensive as all hell these days. And now physics processing units? $600 for a PS3 really doesn't seem so bad now. But I'd still stick with PC's for the keyboard and mouse.
  16. Welcome to the forums (8?]=
  17. It's nice that Steam is eliminating an intermediary, allowing Valve to reap more profits, but it is not nice that a program as simplistic as Steam bumps my memory usage up from 160 to 400, thereby significantly reducing performance in all games on Steam (why, exactly, is Steam so memory intensive? As far as I can tell, it's just a game selections menu with an integrated, half-ass instant messaging program...). In addition, the smoothness of netplay is greatly reduced with Steam; I can still remember how much smoother online play was with Counter-Strike back in the days of WON (yes, I play Counter-Strike now and then . Don't mock me ). Hit detection was virtually immediate. It was also nice to be able to join a Counter-Strike or TFC server in about 3 seconds or less with the old load times. Now it takes roughly 30 seconds. I could go on and on... Of course, everyone is tired of hearing anti-Steam arguments.
  18. woah

    Bioshock

    Modified Unreal Engine 3. Does Irrational Games boast some of the developers (from Looking Glass Studios) of Thief II: The Metal Age? I'm not really sure what to think of the game itself, though. I just read an E3 preview of it at Gamespot. It definitely seems unique, but I'm having trouble getting interested.
  19. If the AI has breasts, some sort of loose clothing (of the likes of the various plastic and cloth drapes in Splinter Cell, except on an actual model), and long hair it could be useful. Or, perhaps, if the AI has some sort of physically-applicable weapon (a mace or even the tentacle of commando zombies in Doom 3) partially ragdoll models could also be useful. Whether or not it is reasonable to pursue partially ragdoll AI in order to to attain one of these features is beyond me. Applying ragdoll to a cloak or something could save some animation work, but I think I was already lectured at one time or another on how such a feature wouldn't be reasonable.
  20. I like this idea. I wasn't really sure if such a feature was even attainable, so I didn't bring it up. It would definitely be a treat to see some black-jacked AI stumble and then go limp, instead of immediately going limp (as if all of the being's muscles and such lost any bit of tenacity on impact). I suppose I did appear to compare Doom 3's and Theif: Deadly Shadow's physics systems as too similar. Doom 3's is much better than Thief: Deadly Shadow's, and if the team finds Doom 3's adequate without any modifactions, I'm sure when all is tweaked the end product will be fine. Perhaps my fears deceived me
  21. I can't help but note the ragdolls in Doom 3 (or any other game to date for that matter) would seem to render themselves quite poor for Thief. Unlike Doom 3, where the player craves to see bodies comically flying through the air, being quite disregardful of how "realistic" they appear, a Thief reproduction demands more believability with ragdolls. I can only imagine how awkward AI blackjack or death incidents would appear with Doom 3's current physics system. I forsee something similar to Thief: Deadly Shadows, where the AI would immediately go unrealistically limp, and then tumble to floor into some repulsive, unrealistic demeanor (often with their backs curled over backwards, all the while with "blank" expressions on their faces). In addition, I recall many moments in Doom 3 where dead, static ragdolls would seem to spontaneously and unreasonably go soaring through the air with applications of even the slightest bit of force (say a punch, or flashlight melee). Has the Dark Mod plans to bypass ragdolls altogether, and simply use animations? Or perhaps you plan on tweaking Doom 3's physics (though, with all of the specialized work in physics these days, I don't think this would be reasonable given the Dark Mod's size)? In all honesty, with the state of ragdoll physics these days, I often still prefer death animations in many instances.
  22. woah

    3rd Person

    I don't really think it is possible or reasonable to argue gameplay from a third person perspective is in any way harder than gameplay from a first person perspective in a "First Person Sneaker." The third person perspective allows one, as you've stated, "to be more strategic" in their actions. "Strategic," in this case, straightforwardly translates to "much less challenging." I understand the attitude portrayed by the regulars here regarding the prospects of third-person perspective could be considered quite bitter, and I also understand that being repeatedly chided on how your preference in gameplay perspective is solely utilized as a result of its unfair advantage could be irritable, but I do not believe there is any further reason to debate this topic, given that--as offending as it may sound--it is clear that this is why you prefer the third-person. But there's nothing wrong with this partiality, and, given one's naturally competitive tendencies, it is a foreseen reaction to become defensive when having been told "my way is more challenging than yours," even when it is true. As for some of the regulars' bitter attitudes, I think you'll find they are rather mellow in threads not pertaining to a feature which would destroy any bit of pleasure they gained from Thief . Though, if only for the sake of delaying these forum goers' progressing RSI syndromes, I think it would be best to not redirect this thread into a discussion regarding the minute difficulties third-person view has over first-person (I can clearly forsee it turning to this), as it is both a waste of time and a boring argument. In addition, any negative associations that haven't already been established between you and the forum's following would become excessive . You mean: The hardest AI settings played in third-person, will be easier than the easiest AI settings played in first person.
  23. woah

    Offset

    New video from GDC in their downloads section. It has a dragon http://www.projectoffset.com/downloads.html
  24. woah

    Hostel

    What is a ghost train?
  25. Haha, I like Slash I'm guessing they may announce ~50% complete, but it will be more likely 25-30% complete. I'd recommend not giving an estimate at all
×
×
  • Create New...