Apologies... I thought it was obvious I tend to skip past most of your posts. Any sensible debate or question that lies within them is unfortunately drowned out by peculiar and quite unnecessary aggression.... thus I just don't feel any urge to respond. I imagine you're permitted to say whatever you like that personally provides you with great pleasure and happiness through "entertainment"........ you'll just have to excuse me if I don't share the same entertainment values as you and thus have absolutely no interest in engaging. I come here to listen to peoples thoughts and opinions on the game and express my own; that is all. I also visit this forum for the TDM fan missions. I'm not here to be rude to people or tell them they are wrong... or right. I remain respectful of all people and their opinions, regardless of whether or not I agree with them. Now that I have answered your question, you should understand why I don't respond to you. I shall continue to ignore you until such a time, of course, you decide to ask a question and/or conduct a worthwhile discussion with me without the habitual need to add pathetcally rude and self-righteous comments within your post. Now THAT would be something I could respond to. Yeah, I wondered about that. No idea if it will make sense in the end but I recall Adam/B1skit mentioning that more information about the arrows is/was in the pipeline. Hope that is still happening. The only logical conclusion I personally can come up with is that the fire arrow head holds a sort of "microflame" in the casement and perhaps the flame is hardly visible to the naked eye - particularly from straight ahead and at a distance. Perhaps you could spot it if you just happen to be looking right at it and see movement to draw your attention. I imagine it burns low because it remains in a state of non-combustion until it breaks out of its casing on impact? No real clue myself. Technically speaking, little miniature "fires" happen all the time at the molecular level and as Thief retains the "mystical"... I guess there is little point trying to justify the science behind the idea (if it is their idea?). No doubt we'll know more about the arrows in due course. I'm looking forward to that.