Jump to content
The Dark Mod Forums

Ambitious suggestion


Recommended Posts

I was messing around with func_rotating and func_pendulum today and it's somewhat annoying having to figure out if the animations of things look proper, so I was thinking would it be possible to have a button which you could press to view everything in motion. For example, you press it and the brush connected to func_pendulum or rotation begins to move so you can see what it will do in-game. There could be a alpha'ed ghost brush in the original place to select, and it would be an option to view like lighting so it would be a quick way to test the map without dmaping it. Would this be too difficult to do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was messing around with func_rotating and func_pendulum today and it's somewhat annoying having to figure out if the animations of things look proper, so I was thinking would it be possible to have a button which you could press to view everything in motion. For example, you press it and the brush connected to func_pendulum or rotation begins to move so you can see what it will do in-game. There could be a alpha'ed ghost brush in the original place to select, and it would be an option to view like lighting so it would be a quick way to test the map without dmaping it. Would this be too difficult to do?

It's fairly difficult. DarkRadiant is lacking the entire game logic: it has no physics, no collisions, no time. Also, DarkRadiant's renderer is potentially too slow if you attempt to simulate the movement (it could get choppy, but this might be acceptable).

 

While it's possible to hack in the time-dependent behaviour for a certain type, it's not very elegant to do so. The behaviour of each func_* entity must be re-coded in DarkRadiant to get it look right. All in all, I think it's a nice feature, but it's a fair amount of work just to replicate something that already exists and works in Doom 3.

 

edit: just saw sparhawk's new post. Making use of the RCF framework might be a possible approach, although the connection is quite slow. The main problem would be to get the entities Think() like they do during game runtime, which will most probably not work very easily if it worked at all.

 

Everything that requires the map to be actually running is probably out of reach for DarkRadiant. Stand-alone systems like the map compiler or collision model manager are easier to hijack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recent Status Updates

    • taffernicus

      i am so euphoric to see new FMs keep coming out and I am keen to try it out in my leisure time, then suddenly my PC is spouting a couple of S.M.A.R.T errors...
      tbf i cannot afford myself to miss my network emulator image file&progress, important ebooks, hyper-v checkpoint & hyper-v export and the precious thief & TDM gamesaves. Don't fall yourself into & lay your hands on crappy SSD
       
      · 2 replies
    • OrbWeaver

      Does anyone actually use the Normalise button in the Surface inspector? Even after looking at the code I'm not quite sure what it's for.
      · 7 replies
    • Ansome

      Turns out my 15th anniversary mission idea has already been done once or twice before! I've been beaten to the punch once again, but I suppose that's to be expected when there's over 170 FMs out there, eh? I'm not complaining though, I love learning new tricks and taking inspiration from past FMs. Best of luck on your own fan missions!
      · 4 replies
    • The Black Arrow

      I wanna play Doom 3, but fhDoom has much better features than dhewm3, yet fhDoom is old, outdated and probably not supported. Damn!
      Makes me think that TDM engine for Doom 3 itself would actually be perfect.
      · 6 replies
    • Petike the Taffer

      Maybe a bit of advice ? In the FM series I'm preparing, the two main characters have the given names Toby and Agnes (it's the protagonist and deuteragonist, respectively), I've been toying with the idea of giving them family names as well, since many of the FM series have named protagonists who have surnames. Toby's from a family who were usually farriers, though he eventually wound up working as a cobbler (this serves as a daylight "front" for his night time thieving). Would it make sense if the man's popularly accepted family name was Farrier ? It's an existing, though less common English surname, and it directly refers to the profession practiced by his relatives. Your suggestions ?
      · 9 replies
×
×
  • Create New...