JackFarmer

May the Builder send mighty lightning bolts to destroy your computer so that this debauched and seductive work never sees the light of day!

Oh, you play original Tomb Raider? Cool!

@chakkman Hammer. Erbauer Hammer. Voller Hammer. (Meine Meinung)

Might be the same problem as reported here?

After reading this you do not have to wonder anymore. Hhowever, Starker handled the situation quite well.

I too think that the availability in the LM software manager might have had a positive effect.

That's an interesting set of questions I pose to myself on a regular basis. @nbohr1more Is there any data available regarding this?

EidosMont/Embracer game design deciders or WTF these guys are called have truly improved amazingly: take a niche game, piss off the original fan base by completely redesigning the game, wait 10+ years, then use the annoying redesign once more and make it even more niche by making it VR. But with them, nothing should surprise you anymore. It's a pity, actually. I think the idea of the eye and a thief who finds the thing a few years after Garret's demise would have been quite good... if it had been set up sensibly after the end of Deadly Shadows in the well-known steampunk-medieval setting. The best thing about the trailer is that it contains the warning that the game is being created “in collaboration with Eidos Montreal”. I didn't think those responsible would be so honest. End of announcement.

If testing sometime between Thursday evening to Monday evening is ok, then sign me in.

1. Pick a random worldspawn brush 2. Look into its properties list and search for spawnargs that don`t belong there. 3. Delete spawnargs which do not belong on worldspawn.

You can give the doors in question the following property and check if it makes a difference: ai_should_not_handle - 1

Will add it to the next revision. Thank you.