Jump to content
The Dark Mod Forums

duzenko

Active Developer
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    4159

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    50

 Content Type 

Everything posted by duzenko

  1. duzenko
    Yes
  2. duzenko
    What about those other glitches in NHAT - do they come back too? As for the sort keywords - well, any mention of _currentRender and it's ignored already automatically @Frost_Salamander Regarding your problem - maybe try the latest dev build?
  3. duzenko
    Hopefully that won't be necessary But the thing is, the build before my changes to sort order also seem to view-flicker in that location Do you have an svn commit that last worked here?
  4. duzenko

    Please, can we finally group the missions by year in the game menu?

    1. Show previous comments  4 more
    2. Xolvix

      Xolvix

      You'd need to have that metadata present somewhere in the downloaded files or the mission database backend. Right now I don't think enough of that info is there, except maybe by guessing the date due to the age of the files in each missions's .pk4.

      Odds are if you want such info, best to use outside sources until/unless the in-game mission downloade is extended to somehow access the info in these links:

      https://www.thedarkmod.com/missions/

      https://wiki.thedarkmod.com/index.php?title=Fan_Missions_for_The_Dark_Mod

       

    3. STiFU

      STiFU

      I'd love it!

    4. Geep

      Geep

      I like the idea of having a way to choose the sort order. Wouldn't mind sort-by-author too.

      As to the data, this looks like one of these cases where you could spend a week programming it for auto updates, or a couple of hours of manual entry. Probably only a dozen data points change per year thereafter.

  5. duzenko
    Yes
  6. duzenko
    @Frost_Salamander Try this: https://e1.pcloud.link/publink/show?code=kZgaGRZ7jc22QYsg1byKxtbEPFqPBRdXdGX
  7. duzenko
    Probably, but it's shared to anyone with a link Are you signed in ?
  8. duzenko
    Dunno, seems to work for me
  9. duzenko
    Rather unexpectedly (for me) this seems to actually fix that there as well
  10. duzenko
    @Frost_Salamander Thank, I've been able to do further tweaking to get this one and the second map version as well to work with old renderer and r_ignore 1 https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9OoHSmkeSeNZWdyZFliQkNsVTA/view?usp=sharing&resourcekey=0-4XspmLMtaTte6z6CuIB42g Can you confirm this on your side?
  11. duzenko
    There should be one face in total Just replace the current material name on the surface to "anything_else"
  12. duzenko
    Good question Yes, just one face And ideally with a material name that does not exist, such as "test_warp". I'll write a material file for it and give it to you later. This standard two-sided reflective material is messy.
  13. duzenko
    Sorry, can we have another model/material combination here? I'm asking because since the window is two-sided (per material) and has a reflection stage which triggers it to generate a second set of back faces, on top of already having two geometry layers It makes debugging and testing cumbersome
  14. duzenko
    If you require the GL3.1 feature, then you should request/check what context you're given by the driver AFAIR the version 3.1 was "funny" in that regard - you can neither request version nor profile (core or compatibility) when creating context so can only check its version after it has been created. Also when it comes to HD3000, at least on windows its drivers were full of bugs on the features that were only just added in GL3.1. I think it was the only formally 'compatible' chip that we refused to support when we required 3.1 as minimum version. I suppose the modern Mesa drivers are much better in that regard.
  15. duzenko

    I vaguely recall someone recently complained about two-sided materials (curtains?) not getting lighting from both sides

    I just found a piece of code that's supposed to do just that

    Where was that discussed? (@nbohr1more?)

    1. Show previous comments  6 more
    2. duzenko

      duzenko

      I don't understand

      Does it only work with inverted blue channel? Because there's another way to achieve it.

    3. kingsal

      kingsal

      Im not sure, like I said I didn't test this myself because it wasn't critical to my mission. @Spooksmight know more.

    4. stgatilov

      stgatilov

      Yes, it only works with negative Z channel, so it is incompatible with RGTC compression.

      So it requires forceHighQuality (i.e. disable texture compression) but was still broken. Supposedly, I fixed it for 2.10: https://bugs.thedarkmod.com/view.php?id=5862

  16. duzenko
    I suppose so - I will play with it more
  17. duzenko
    Here I single out the window entity and no clipped into it So it's two layers now, and I think it was only one?
  18. duzenko
    Something else changed though and it now behaves differently It was 14 surfaces to draw, now it's 16
  19. duzenko
    I think that's the only change worth your time right now Yes, please attach new version
  20. duzenko
    I stick to IPS's because my wife's work is in Photoshop (even though her employer put shitty cheap TN's in their office) And because my last TN was god-awful to the point of traumatizing For that latter reason I have prejudice against everything Acer, too
  21. duzenko
    I totally forgot about that Still, if we just add the drawSortOffset spawnarg on the window entity it's unlike to make it overlap properly, no? It's hard for me to check because the test map window is a brush, not an entity. I think this request is different to that, - @Dragofer asked for "regular" translucents, while we're talking about screenshot-based distortions here.
  22. duzenko
    https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9OoHSmkeSeNZWdyZFliQkNsVTA/view?usp=sharing&resourcekey=0-4XspmLMtaTte6z6CuIB42g When game has loaded, go to console and toggle r_ignore 0/1 to switch this on and off This is not a 'fix', just something to play around while we discuss this further We still need to decide how we make your design to opt it into this
  23. duzenko
    @Frost_Salamander Should it be implemented as material flag. entity spawnarg, or global map parameter? I'm reluctant to force enable this for all because it's a huge potential fps drop in existing missions BTW I can see the splash particle now but you should really stretch it to the size of the rain particle because it's rather confusing otherwise
  24. duzenko
    Exactly If it does not have a second function on long push, it has to trigger on push down by default Otherwise those american teens are going to start assuming that guns fire only when you release the trigger
  25. duzenko
    That's what I meant, yes:
×
×
  • Create New...